↓ Skip to main content

The feasibility of community mobilisation for child injury prevention in rural Nepal: a programme for female community health volunteers

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The feasibility of community mobilisation for child injury prevention in rural Nepal: a programme for female community health volunteers
Published in
BMC Public Health, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12889-015-1783-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Puspa Raj Pant, Bharat Budhathoki, Matthew Ellis, Dharma Manandhar, Toity Deave, Julie Mytton

Abstract

Injuries accounted for 23% of all deaths in children and adolescents in Nepal during 2010 (n = 3,700). Despite this, there is no national death registration or injury surveillance system. Non-fatal injuries are many times more common than fatal injuries and may leave the injured person with lifelong consequences. Children in low-income settings are exposed to widespread risks of injuries but there is little awareness of how they can be prevented. Community mobilisation has been shown to be effective to reduce maternal and neonatal morbidity. This study aimed to develop a child safety programme and assess the feasibility of delivering the programme through a community mobilisation approach. We developed a culturally appropriate, educational programme for Female Community Health Volunteers that included both primary and secondary prevention materials for unintentional child injuries. We determined the feasibility of evaluating its effectiveness through the mobilisation of women's groups in rural Nepal. Ten women's groups across 9 wards in one village development committee area completed the programme during 6 monthly meetings. Parent-reported injuries were collected through a notification system established for this study. Experience of the programme by women's group participants and leaders was assessed through a structured questionnaire and process measures assessed the delivery and reach of the programme. Programme resources were developed for this setting and adapted following feedback from users. Nine FCHVs received first-aid training and shown how to use the facilitation manual and injury prevention resources. The FCHVs convened 10 women's groups to run over 6 months with 24-29 mothers attending each meeting (290 mothers participated in total). Each group presented their views on child injury risks and proposed prevention activities at local public meetings. Women reported 155 injuries to children under 18 years during 7 months of follow up using the notification system. It is feasible to develop and implement a community mobilisation intervention where women's groups work together with local FCHVs to prevent injuries in children. The intervention was well received by the women's groups and by community members. The effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the intervention should now be evaluated through an experimental study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 99 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 16%
Student > Master 16 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 30 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 29%
Social Sciences 12 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 11%
Psychology 3 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 36 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#6,353,182
of 25,260,058 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,516
of 16,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,591
of 271,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#99
of 247 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,260,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,903 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 247 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.