↓ Skip to main content

The re-emergence of dengue in China

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The re-emergence of dengue in China
Published in
BMC Medicine, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12916-015-0345-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eng Eong Ooi

Abstract

The number of reports in the literature on dengue outbreaks in various parts of south China is increasing. This trend is likely contributed to by multiple factors, chief among which is the increase in trade and human movement in and out of China from the Southeast Asian region where dengue is firmly endemic. However, a holistic picture of dengue in China and how the public health authorities are responding to this global health challenge has been missing. In a research article published in BMC Medicine, Lai et al. have now filled this gap in knowledge by analysing statutorily mandated national dengue surveillance data from 1990 till 2014. They also conducted time series analyses to identify key drivers of dengue transmission in south China as well as from south China to the other parts of this vast and populous country. Their findings, as well as the description of surveillance and disease control activities in China, highlight urgent steps that need to be taken if China wishes to prevent itself from becoming another country that experiences large and frequent cycles of epidemic dengue.Please see related article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0336-1 .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 5%
Nigeria 1 3%
Unknown 37 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 23%
Student > Bachelor 7 18%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 8 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 10%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Mathematics 1 3%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 9 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2015.
All research outputs
#13,808,173
of 24,615,949 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#2,940
of 3,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,583
of 269,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#77
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,615,949 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,805 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.9. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.