↓ Skip to main content

Large scale mitochondrial sequencing in Mexican Americans suggests a reappraisal of Native American origins

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
41 X users
facebook
11 Facebook pages
wikipedia
11 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Large scale mitochondrial sequencing in Mexican Americans suggests a reappraisal of Native American origins
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-11-293
Pubmed ID
Authors

Satish Kumar, Claire Bellis, Mark Zlojutro, Phillip E Melton, John Blangero, Joanne E Curran

Abstract

The Asian origin of Native Americans is largely accepted. However uncertainties persist regarding the source population(s) within Asia, the divergence and arrival time(s) of the founder groups, the number of expansion events, and migration routes into the New World. mtDNA data, presented over the past two decades, have been used to suggest a single-migration model for which the Beringian land mass plays an important role.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Unknown 123 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 25%
Researcher 22 17%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Master 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 24 18%
Unknown 18 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 18%
Social Sciences 9 7%
Arts and Humanities 5 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 4%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 20 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#873,761
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#172
of 3,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,469
of 149,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#3
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.