↓ Skip to main content

The association between time to antibiotics and relevant clinical outcomes in emergency department patients with various stages of sepsis: a prospective multi-center study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
33 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The association between time to antibiotics and relevant clinical outcomes in emergency department patients with various stages of sepsis: a prospective multi-center study
Published in
Critical Care, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13054-015-0936-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bas de Groot, Annemieke Ansems, Daan H Gerling, Douwe Rijpsma, Paul van Amstel, Durk Linzel, Piet J Kostense, Marianne Jonker, Evert de Jonge

Abstract

In early sepsis stages, optimal treatment could contribute to prevention of progression to severe sepsis. Therefore, we investigated if there was an association between time to antibiotics and relevant clinical outcomes in hospitalized emergency department (ED) patients with mild to severe sepsis stages. Design. Prospective multi-centre study in 3 Dutch ED's. Patients were stratified in 3 categories of illness severity, as assessed by the predisposition, infection, response, organ failure (PIRO) score: PIRO score 1-7, 8-14 and >14 points reflected low, intermediate and high illness severity, respectively. Participents. Consecutive hospitalized ED patients with a suspected infection who were treated with intravenous antibiotics. Number of surviving days outside the hospital at day 28 was used as an inverse measure of hospital lengths of stay (LOS). Secondary outcome measure: 28-day mortality, taking into acccount the time to mortality. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to estimate the association between time to antibiotics and the primary and secondary outcome measures corrected for confounders, including appropriateness of antibiotics and initial ED resuscitation, in 3 categories of illness severity. Hundred twelve (10%) of 1168 included patients died, while 85% and 95% received antibiotics within 3 and 6 hours, respectively. No association between time to antibiotics and surviving days outside the hospital or mortality was found. Only in PIRO group 1-7 delayed administration of antibiotics (>3 hrs) was associated with an increase in surviving days outside the hospital at day 28 (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.05-2.02 after correction for potential confounders). In ED patients with mild to severe sepsis who received antibiotics within 6 hours after ED presentation, a reduction in time to antibiotics was not found to be associated with an improvement in relevant clinical outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 149 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 12%
Other 17 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Other 43 28%
Unknown 32 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 8%
Unspecified 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 32 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2016.
All research outputs
#1,382,045
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,202
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,907
of 395,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#75
of 466 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 466 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.