↓ Skip to main content

Capecitabine and irinotecan with bevacizumab 2-weekly for metastatic colorectal cancer: the phase II AVAXIRI study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Capecitabine and irinotecan with bevacizumab 2-weekly for metastatic colorectal cancer: the phase II AVAXIRI study
Published in
BMC Cancer, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12885-015-1293-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pilar Garcia-Alfonso, Manuel Chaves, Andrés Muñoz, Antonieta Salud, Maria García-Gonzalez, Cristina Grávalos, Bartomeu Massuti, Encarna González-Flores, Bernardo Queralt, Amelia López-Ladrón, Ferran Losa, Maria Jose Gómez, Amparo Oltra, Enrique Aranda, on behalf of the Spanish Cooperative Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumors (TTD)

Abstract

The optimal sequence of chemotherapeutic agents is not firmly established for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This phase II multi-centre study investigated the efficacy and tolerability of a standard capecitabine plus irinotecan (XELIRI) regimen with bevacizumab in previously untreated patients with mCRC. Patients received intravenous irinotecan 175 mg/m(2) on day 1 and oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) (800 mg/m(2) for patients >65 years of age) twice daily on days 2-8, followed by a 1-week rest, and bevacizumab 5 mg/kg as an intravenous infusion on day 1 every 2 weeks. Seventy-seven patients were included in the intention-to-treat and safety populations. Progression-free survival at 9 months was 61%. The overall response and disease control rates were 51% and 84%, respectively. Median progression-free and overall survival times were 11.9 and 24.8 months, respectively. 48 patients (62%) had at least one grade 3/4 adverse event, the most common being asthenia, diarrhoea and neutropenia. Quality of life varied little over the study period with mean visual analogue scale general health scores ranging from 71 to 76 over cycles 1-11. Our study found irinotecan and capecitabine administered fortnightly with bevacizumab in patients with mCRC to be an effective and tolerable regimen. clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT00875771 . Trial registration date: 04/02/2009.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 30%
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Other 9 13%
Researcher 5 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Environmental Science 5 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 10 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2015.
All research outputs
#17,754,724
of 22,800,560 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#4,958
of 8,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,035
of 264,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#152
of 255 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,800,560 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,297 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 255 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.