↓ Skip to main content

Visual analysis of biological data-knowledge networks

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Visual analysis of biological data-knowledge networks
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12859-015-0550-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Corinna Vehlow, David P Kao, Michael R Bristow, Lawrence E Hunter, Daniel Weiskopf, Carsten Görg

Abstract

The interpretation of the results from genome-scale experiments is a challenging and important problem in contemporary biomedical research. Biological networks that integrate experimental results with existing knowledge from biomedical databases and published literature can provide a rich resource and powerful basis for hypothesizing about mechanistic explanations for observed gene-phenotype relationships. However, the size and density of such networks often impede their efficient exploration and understanding. We introduce a visual analytics approach that integrates interactive filtering of dense networks based on degree-of-interest functions with attribute-based layouts of the resulting subnetworks. The comparison of multiple subnetworks representing different analysis facets is facilitated through an interactive super-network that integrates brushing-and-linking techniques for highlighting components across networks. An implementation is freely available as an Cytoscape app. We demonstrate the utility of our approach through two case studies using a dataset that combines clinical data with high-throughput data for studying the effect of β-blocker treatment on heart failure patients. Furthermore, we discuss our team-based iterative design and development process as well as the limitations and generalizability of our approach.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Brazil 1 1%
Turkey 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Luxembourg 1 1%
Unknown 77 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 19%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Other 7 8%
Other 19 22%
Unknown 7 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 22%
Computer Science 17 20%
Engineering 11 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 12 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2015.
All research outputs
#5,028,811
of 24,143,470 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#1,868
of 7,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,049
of 268,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#36
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,143,470 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,506 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.