You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Promoting smoking cessation in Pakistani and Bangladeshi men in the UK: pilot cluster randomised controlled trial of trained community outreach workers
|
---|---|
Published in |
Trials, August 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1745-6215-12-197 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rachna A Begh, Paul Aveyard, Penney Upton, Raj S Bhopal, Martin White, Amanda Amos, Robin J Prescott, Raman Bedi, Pelham Barton, Monica Fletcher, Paramjit Gill, Qaim Zaidi, Aziz Sheikh |
Abstract |
Smoking prevalence is high among Pakistani and Bangladeshi men in the UK, but there are few tailored smoking cessation programmes for Pakistani and Bangladeshi communities. The aim of this study was to pilot a cluster randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of Pakistani and Bangladeshi smoking cessation outreach workers with standard care to improve access to and the success of English smoking cessation services. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 130 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 21 | 16% |
Student > Master | 20 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 11% |
Other | 13 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
Other | 25 | 19% |
Unknown | 30 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 29% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 16% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 8% |
Psychology | 7 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
Other | 16 | 12% |
Unknown | 35 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2014.
All research outputs
#6,242,079
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#2,283
of 5,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,667
of 123,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#9
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,817 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.