↓ Skip to main content

Migration towards SDF-1 selects angiogenin-expressing bone marrow monocytes endowed with cardiac reparative activity in patients with previous myocardial infarction

Overview of attention for article published in Stem Cell Research & Therapy, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Migration towards SDF-1 selects angiogenin-expressing bone marrow monocytes endowed with cardiac reparative activity in patients with previous myocardial infarction
Published in
Stem Cell Research & Therapy, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13287-015-0028-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raimondo Ascione, Jonathan Rowlinson, Elisa Avolio, Rajesh Katare, Marco Meloni, Helen L Spencer, Giuseppe Mangialardi, Caroline Norris, Nicolle Kränkel, Gaia Spinetti, Costanza Emanueli, Paolo Madeddu

Abstract

Chemokine-directed migration is crucial for homing of regenerative cells to the infarcted heart and correlates with outcomes of cell therapy trials. Hence, transplantation of chemokine-responsive bone marrow (BM) cells may be ideal for treatment of myocardial ischemia. To verify the therapeutic activity of BM mononuclear cells (BM-MNCs) selected by in vitro migration towards the chemokine stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1) in a mouse model of myocardial infarction (MI). We used for this purpose BM-MNCs from patients with previous large MI recruited in the TransACT-1&2 cell therapy trials. Un-fractioned BM-MNCs, SDF-1 responsive, and SDF-1 non-responsive BM-MNCs isolated by patients recruited in the TransACT-1&2 cell therapy trials were tested in Matrigel assay to evaluate angiogenic potential. Secretome and antigenic profile were characterized by flow cytometry. Angiogenin expression was measured by RT-PCR. Cells groups were also intra-myocardially injected in an in vivo model of MI (8 weeks-old immune deficient CD1-FOXN1(nu/nu) mice). Echocardiography and heamodynamic measurements were performed before and at 14 days post-MI. Arterioles and capillaries density, infiltration of inflammatory cells, interstitial fibrosis, and cardiomyocyte proliferation and apoptosis were assessed by immunohistochemistry. In vitro migration enriched for monocytes, while CD34(+) and CD133(+) cells and T-lymphocytes remained mainly confined in the non-migrated fraction. Un-fractioned total BM-MNCs promoted angiogenesis on Matrigel more efficiently than migrated or non-migrated cells. In mice with induced MI, intra-myocardial injection of un-fractionated or migrated BM-MNCs was more effective in preserving cardiac contractility and pressure indexes than vehicle or non-migrated BM-MNCs. Moreover, un-fractioned BM-MNCs enhanced neovascularization, whereas the migrated fraction was unique in reducing the infarct size and interstitial fibrosis. In vitro studies on isolated cardiomyocytes suggest participation of angiogenin, a secreted ribonuclease that inhibits protein translation under stress conditions, in promotion of cardiomyocyte survival by migrated BM-MNCs. Transplantation of BM cells helps post-MI healing through distinct actions on vascular cells and cardiomyocytes. In addition, the SDF-1-responsive fraction is enriched with angiogenin-expressing monocytes, which may improve cardiac recovery through activation of cardiomyocyte response to stress. Identification of factors linking migratory and therapeutic outcomes could help refining regenerative approaches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 55 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 21%
Researcher 10 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 18%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 10 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 11%
Engineering 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 11 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2015.
All research outputs
#3,722,170
of 22,800,560 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#350
of 2,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,369
of 264,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#17
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,800,560 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.