↓ Skip to main content

Integrative analysis and machine learning on cancer genomics data using the Cancer Systems Biology Database (CancerSysDB)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Integrative analysis and machine learning on cancer genomics data using the Cancer Systems Biology Database (CancerSysDB)
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, April 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12859-018-2157-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rasmus Krempel, Pranav Kulkarni, Annie Yim, Ulrich Lang, Bianca Habermann, Peter Frommolt

Abstract

Recent cancer genome studies on many human cancer types have relied on multiple molecular high-throughput technologies. Given the vast amount of data that has been generated, there are surprisingly few databases which facilitate access to these data and make them available for flexible analysis queries in the broad research community. If used in their entirety and provided at a high structural level, these data can be directed into constantly increasing databases which bear an enormous potential to serve as a basis for machine learning technologies with the goal to support research and healthcare with predictions of clinically relevant traits. We have developed the Cancer Systems Biology Database (CancerSysDB), a resource for highly flexible queries and analysis of cancer-related data across multiple data types and multiple studies. The CancerSysDB can be adopted by any center for the organization of their locally acquired data and its integration with publicly available data from multiple studies. A publicly available main instance of the CancerSysDB can be used to obtain highly flexible queries across multiple data types as shown by highly relevant use cases. In addition, we demonstrate how the CancerSysDB can be used for predictive cancer classification based on whole-exome data from 9091 patients in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) research network. Our database bears the potential to be used for large-scale integrative queries and predictive analytics of clinically relevant traits.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 20%
Student > Master 13 19%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 16 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 19%
Computer Science 8 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 7%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 19 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2018.
All research outputs
#20,483,282
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#6,894
of 7,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#287,532
of 326,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#80
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.