You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Growth and stress response in Arabidopsis thaliana, Nicotiana benthamiana, Glycine max, Solanum tuberosum and Brassica napus cultivated under polychromatic LEDs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-015-0076-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin Janda, Oldřich Navrátil, Daniel Haisel, Barbora Jindřichová, Jan Fousek, Lenka Burketová, Noemi Čeřovská, Tomáš Moravec |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 69 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 17% |
| Researcher | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 17 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 51% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 17 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2015.
All research outputs
#18,409,030
of 22,803,211 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#955
of 1,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,228
of 263,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#11
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,803,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,080 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.