↓ Skip to main content

The socioeconomic and environmental impacts of wood energy value chains in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic map protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The socioeconomic and environmental impacts of wood energy value chains in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic map protocol
Published in
Environmental Evidence, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13750-015-0038-3
Authors

Paolo Omar Cerutti, Phosiso Sola, Audrey Chenevoy, Miyuki Iiyama, Jummai Yila, Wen Zhou, Houria Djoudi, Richard Eba’a Atyi, Denis Jean Gautier, Davison Gumbo, Yannick Kuehl, Patrice Levang, Christopher Martius, Robin Matthews, Robert Nasi, Henry Neufeldt, Mary Njenga, Gillian Petrokofsky, Matthew Saunders, Gill Shepherd, Denis Jean Sonwa, Cecilia Sundberg, Meine van Noordwijk

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Kenya 2 1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 152 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 22%
Student > Master 27 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 29 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 44 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 19%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 6%
Engineering 9 6%
Energy 9 6%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 34 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#6,745,384
of 25,378,162 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#198
of 329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,361
of 281,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 329 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.