↓ Skip to main content

Linking social and built environmental factors to the health of public housing residents: a focus group study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Linking social and built environmental factors to the health of public housing residents: a focus group study
Published in
BMC Public Health, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12889-015-1710-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erin Hayward, Chidinma Ibe, Jeffery Hunter Young, Karthya Potti, Paul Jones, Craig Evan Pollack, Kimberly A Gudzune

Abstract

Public housing residents have a high risk of chronic disease, which may be related to neighborhood environmental factors. Our objective was to understand how public housing residents perceive that the social and built environments might influence their health and wellbeing. We conducted focus groups of residents from a low-income public housing community in Baltimore, MD to assess their perceptions of health and neighborhood attributes, resources, and social structure. Focus groups were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Two investigators independently coded transcripts for thematic content using editing style analysis technique. Twenty-eight residents participated in six focus groups. All were African American and the majority were women. Most had lived in public housing for more than 5 years. We identified four themes: public housing's unhealthy physical environment limits health and wellbeing, the city environment limits opportunities for healthy lifestyle choices, lack of trust in relationships contributes to social isolation, and increased neighborhood social capital could improve wellbeing. Changes in housing and city policies might lead to improved environmental health conditions for public housing residents. Policymakers and researchers may consider promoting community cohesiveness to attempt to empower residents in facilitating neighborhood change.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Unknown 166 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 13%
Student > Master 22 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 28 17%
Unknown 40 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 38 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 31 19%
Unknown 52 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2015.
All research outputs
#5,702,888
of 22,803,211 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,684
of 14,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,807
of 264,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#105
of 256 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,803,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,855 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 256 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.