↓ Skip to main content

Factors associated with knowledge of hypertension among adolescents: implications for preventive education programs in primary care

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors associated with knowledge of hypertension among adolescents: implications for preventive education programs in primary care
Published in
BMC Public Health, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12889-015-1773-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Iga Grad, Agnieszka Mastalerz-Migas, Katarzyna Kiliś-Pstrusińska

Abstract

Hypertension (HT) amongst adolescents remains a vital issue of both a medical and social nature. There is a lack of data regarding the factors influencing the awareness of the disease among the youth. The aim of this study was to evaluate the knowledge about HT among adolescents and its level corresponding to the selected demographic, environmental and medical factors. The study was carried out among 249 adolescents of secondary schools. The authors' questionnaire poll and the psychological tests Personal Values List (PVL) and Personal Competence Scale (PCS) were performed. Only 13.2% of the youth surveyed displayed the "medium" level (defined below) of HT knowledge. Most of them present satisfactory knowledge about the causes of HT. The children from urban areas generally displayed better knowledge about HT than their peers from rural regions. Only the children who had had their blood pressure previously examined displayed good knowledge about HT. The most frequently indicated source of this knowledge was school; however, its level still remains low. There was no significant association between the level of global knowledge about HT and the feeling of one's own competences and considering the category "good health" an important personal value. Knowledge about HT among adolescents remains unsatisfactory and random, which indicates the necessity for routine education in this field, especially as it applies to HT symptoms. It seems that the consideration of such elements as blood pressure measurement and family history of HT in education programs can improve their efficiency.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 111 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 13%
Student > Postgraduate 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Lecturer 7 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 6%
Other 23 21%
Unknown 42 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 20%
Psychology 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 46 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2015.
All research outputs
#13,739,018
of 22,803,211 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,910
of 14,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,513
of 264,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#152
of 233 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,803,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,856 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 233 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.