↓ Skip to main content

Neuropathic pain after brachial plexus avulsion - central and peripheral mechanisms

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neurology, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neuropathic pain after brachial plexus avulsion - central and peripheral mechanisms
Published in
BMC Neurology, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12883-015-0329-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira, Matheus Gomes da S da Paz, Mauro Tupiniquim Bina, Scheila Nogueira Santos, Irina Raicher, Ricardo Galhardoni, Diego Toledo Fernandes, Lin T Yeng, Abrahão F Baptista, Daniel Ciampi de Andrade

Abstract

The pain that commonly occurs after brachial plexus avulsion poses an additional burden on the quality of life of patients already impaired by motor, sensory and autonomic deficits. Evidence-based treatments for the pain associated with brachial plexus avulsion are scarce, thus frequently leaving the condition refractory to treatment with the standard methods used to manage neuropathic pain. Unfortunately, little is known about the pathophysiology of brachial plexus avulsion. Available evidence indicates that besides primary nerve root injury, central lesions related to the abrupt disconnection of nerve roots from the spinal cord may play an important role in the genesis of neuropathic pain in these patients and may explain in part its refractoriness to treatment. The understanding of both central and peripheral mechanisms that contribute to the development of pain is of major importance in order to propose more effective treatments for brachial plexus avulsion-related pain. This review focuses on the current understanding about the occurrence of neuropathic pain in these patients and the role played by peripheral and central mechanisms that provides insights into its treatment. Pain after brachial plexus avulsion involves both peripheral and central components; thereby it is characterized as a mixed (central and peripheral) neuropathic pain syndrome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 132 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 13%
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 17 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Other 30 23%
Unknown 28 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 42%
Neuroscience 13 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Engineering 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 36 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,458,462
of 22,803,211 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neurology
#845
of 2,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,736
of 264,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neurology
#18
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,803,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,435 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.