Title |
Comparative proteomic analysis of spermatozoa isolated by swim-up or density gradient centrifugation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, April 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12958-015-0027-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Stefania Luppi, Monica Martinelli, Elisa Giacomini, Elena Giolo, Gabriella Zito, Rodolfo C Garcia, Giuseppe Ricci |
Abstract |
Reports about the morphologic and functional characteristics of spermatozoa prepared by density gradient centrifugation (DC) or swim-up (SU) have produced discordant results. We have performed a proteomic comparison of cells prepared by DC and SU providing a molecular insight into the differences between these two methods of sperm cell isolation. Protein maps were obtained by 2-dimensional (2-D) separations consisting of isoelectrofocusing (IEF) from pI 3 to 11 followed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. 2-D gels were stained with Sypro Ruby. Map images of DC and SU spermatozoa were compared using dedicated software. Intensities of a given spot were considered different between DC and SU when their group mean differed by >1.5-fold (p < 0.05, Anova). No differences were observed for 853 spots, indicating a 98.7% similarity between DC and SU. Five spots were DC > SU and 1 was SU > DC. Proteins present in 3 of the differential spots could be identified. One DC > SU spot contained lactate dehydrogenase C and gamma-glutamylhydrolase, a second DC > SU spot contained fumarate hydratase and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase-2, and a SU > DC spot contained pyruvate kinase M1/M2. The differences in protein levels found on comparison of DC with SU spermatozoa indicate possible dissimilarities in their glycolytic metabolism and DNA methylation and suggest that DC cells may have a better capacitation potential. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 37 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 11% |
Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
Other | 5 | 13% |
Unknown | 8 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 18% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 16% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 16% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 5% |
Engineering | 2 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 12 | 32% |