↓ Skip to main content

Evidence based post graduate training. A systematic review of reviews based on the WFME quality framework

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence based post graduate training. A systematic review of reviews based on the WFME quality framework
Published in
BMC Medical Education, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-11-80
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annelies Damen, Roy Remmen, Johan Wens, Dominique Paulus

Abstract

A framework for high quality in post graduate training has been defined by the World Federation of Medical Education (WFME). The objective of this paper is to perform a systematic review of reviews to find current evidence regarding aspects of quality of post graduate training and to organise the results following the 9 areas of the WFME framework.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ecuador 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 78 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 30%
Researcher 10 13%
Other 9 11%
Professor 8 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 11 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 11%
Psychology 4 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 14 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2012.
All research outputs
#18,297,449
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#2,721
of 3,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,271
of 133,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#23
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,290 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.