ā†“ Skip to main content

Quality of randomized controlled trials reporting in the treatment of melasma conducted in China

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quality of randomized controlled trials reporting in the treatment of melasma conducted in China
Published in
Trials, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13063-015-0677-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhiwei Chen, Yuchi Chen, Jingchun Zeng, Yang Wang, Teng Ye, Qiaochu Zhou, Xiaojing Du, Wenting Su, Zhishan Ding

Abstract

There is no existing report on the quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of melasma treatment currently conducted in China. This study aims to assess the quality of RCT- reporting in the treatment of melasma conducted in China. Several databases were searched from their inception through to August 2014. In order to rate the report quality, we scored 1 for the item if it was reported in CONSORT 2010 and 0 for the item if it was not definitely stated or was not clear. For overall quality score (OQS), 13 items were scored and calculated with a range of 0 to 13. Five items ('randomization', 'allocation concealment', 'blinding', 'baseline characteristics' and 'intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis') were scored and a key methodological index score (MIS) was calculated with a range of 0 to 5 for each trial. A total of 246 relevant RCTs were included in the final analysis. The median OQS was 7, with a minimum of 4 and a maximum of 11. Some items' information was insufficient, especially in the categories of 'trial design', 'sample size', 'recruitment' and 'ancillary analyses' with a positive rate of less than 20%. The median MIS was 1 with a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 3. Some items' reporting was poor, especially in the categories of 'randomization', 'allocation concealment and implementation', 'blinding' and 'ITT analysis' with a positive rate of less than 10%. The mean OQS increased by about 0.52 for manuscripts published in the period of 5-year increments (95% CI: 0.32 to 0.72; Pā€‰<ā€‰0.001). With regard to the MIS, no variable was statistically significant in the ordinal regression model. The reporting quality of RCTs in the treatment of melasma conducted in China is not satisfactory especially in key methodological items. Reporting of RCTs in this field should meet and keep up with the standards of the CONSORT statement.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 19%
Other 3 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 8 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 48%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 30%