↓ Skip to main content

Persistent organic pollutants as risk factors for type 2 diabetes

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Persistent organic pollutants as risk factors for type 2 diabetes
Published in
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13098-015-0031-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elvis Ndonwi Ngwa, Andre-Pascal Kengne, Barbara Tiedeu-Atogho, Edith-Pascale Mofo-Mato, Eugene Sobngwi

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a major and fast growing public health problem. Although obesity is considered to be the main driver of the pandemic of T2DM, a possible contribution of some environmental contaminants, of which persistent organic pollutants (POPs) form a particular class, has been suggested. POPs are organic compounds that are resistant to environmental degradation through chemical, biological, and photolytic processes which enable them to persist in the environment, to be capable of long-range transport, bio accumulate in human and animal tissue, bio accumulate in food chains, and to have potential significant impacts on human health and the environment. Several epidemiological studies have reported an association between persistent organic pollutants and diabetes risk. These findings have been replicated in experimental studies both in human (in-vitro) and animals (in-vivo and in-vitro), and patho-physiological derangements through which these pollutants exercise their harmful effect on diabetes risk postulated. This review summarizes available studies, emphasises on limitations so as to enable subsequent studies to be centralized on possible pathways and bring out clearly the role of POPs on diabetes risk.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 115 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 17%
Student > Bachelor 15 13%
Student > Master 14 12%
Researcher 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 31 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 12%
Environmental Science 6 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 38 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2018.
All research outputs
#2,727,363
of 24,679,965 outputs
Outputs from Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome
#96
of 759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,394
of 268,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,679,965 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 759 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.