↓ Skip to main content

Field phenotyping of grapevine growth using dense stereo reconstruction

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Field phenotyping of grapevine growth using dense stereo reconstruction
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12859-015-0560-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Klodt, Katja Herzog, Reinhard Töpfer, Daniel Cremers

Abstract

The demand for high-throughput and objective phenotyping in plant research has been increasing during the last years due to large experimental sites. Sensor-based, non-invasive and automated processes are needed to overcome the phenotypic bottleneck, which limits data volumes on account of manual evaluations. A major challenge for sensor-based phenotyping in vineyards is the distinction between the grapevine in the foreground and the field in the background - this is especially the case for red-green-blue (RGB) images, where similar color distributions occur both in the foreground plant and in the field and background plants. However, RGB cameras are a suitable tool in the field because they provide high-resolution data at fast acquisition rates with robustness to outdoor illumination. This study presents a method to segment the phenotypic classes 'leaf', 'stem', 'grape' and 'background' in RGB images that were taken with a standard consumer camera in vineyards. Background subtraction is achieved by taking two images of each plant for depth reconstruction. The color information is furthermore used to distinguish the leaves from stem and grapes in the foreground. The presented approach allows for objective computation of phenotypic traits like 3D leaf surface areas and fruit-to-leaf ratios. The method has been successfully applied to objective assessment of growth habits of new breeding lines. To this end, leaf areas of two breeding lines were monitored and compared with traditional cultivars. A statistical analysis of the method shows a significant (p <0.001) determination coefficient R (2)= 0.93 and root-mean-square error of 3.0%. The presented approach allows for non-invasive, fast and objective assessment of plant growth. The main contributions of this study are 1) the robust segmentation of RGB images taken from a standard consumer camera directly in the field, 2) in particular, the robust background subtraction via reconstruction of dense depth maps, and 3) phenotypic applications to monitoring of plant growth and computation of fruit-to-leaf ratios in 3D. This advance provides a promising tool for high-throughput, automated image acquisition, e.g., for field robots.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 3%
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 72 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 19%
Student > Master 12 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 9%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 12 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 43%
Engineering 9 12%
Computer Science 8 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Environmental Science 3 4%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 17 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2015.
All research outputs
#17,756,606
of 22,803,211 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#5,930
of 7,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,931
of 264,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#107
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,803,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,281 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.