↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating an extended rehabilitation service for stroke patients (EXTRAS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating an extended rehabilitation service for stroke patients (EXTRAS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Published in
Trials, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13063-015-0704-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen Rodgers, Lisa Shaw, Robin Cant, Avril Drummond, Gary A Ford, Anne Forster, Katie Hills, Denise Howel, Anne-Marie Laverty, Christopher McKevitt, Peter McMeekin, Christopher Price

Abstract

Development of longer term stroke rehabilitation services is limited by lack of evidence of effectiveness for specific interventions and service models. We describe the protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial which is evaluating an extended stroke rehabilitation service. The extended service commences when routine 'organized stroke care' (stroke unit and early supported discharge (ESD)) ends. This study is a multicentre randomised controlled trial with health economic and process evaluations. It is set within NHS stroke services which provide ESD. Participants are adults who have experienced a new stroke (and carer if appropriate), discharged from hospital under the care of an ESD team. The intervention group receives an extended stroke rehabilitation service provided for 18 months following completion of ESD. The extended rehabilitation service involves regular contact with a senior ESD team member who leads and coordinates further rehabilitation. Contact is usually by telephone. The control group receives usual stroke care post-ESD. Usual care may involve referral of patients to a range of rehabilitation services upon completion of ESD in accordance with local clinical practice. Randomisation is via a central independent web-based service. The primary outcome is extended activities of daily living (Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale) at 24 months post-randomisation. Secondary outcomes (at 12 and 24 months post-randomisation) are health status, quality of life, mood and experience of services for patients, and quality of life, experience of services and carer stress for carers. Resource use and adverse events are also collected. Outcomes are undertaken by a blinded assessor. Implementation and delivery of the extended stroke rehabilitation service will also be described. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with a subsample of participants and staff to gain insight into perceptions and experiences of rehabilitation services delivered or received. Allowing for 25% attrition, 510 participants are needed to provide 90% power to detect a difference in mean Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale score of 6 with a 5% significance level. The provision of longer term support for stroke survivors is currently limited. The results from this trial will inform future stroke service planning and configuration. This trial was registered with (identifier: ISRCTN45203373 ) on 9 August 2012.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 189 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 10%
Researcher 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Other 29 15%
Unknown 66 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 36 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 15%
Psychology 17 9%
Neuroscience 12 6%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 75 39%