↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: a SNP profiling panel for sample tracking in whole-exome sequencing studies

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Medicine, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: a SNP profiling panel for sample tracking in whole-exome sequencing studies
Published in
Genome Medicine, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13073-015-0163-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Reuben J Pengelly, Jane Gibson, Gaia Andreoletti, Andrew Collins, Christopher J Mattocks, Sarah Ennis

Abstract

This is an Erratum to Genome Medicine 2013, 5:89, highlighting an error in Table 1 of the original article. Please see related article: http://genomemedicine.com/content/5/9/89.[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1186/gm492.].

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 19%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 19%
Engineering 2 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 2 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2015.
All research outputs
#17,756,606
of 22,803,211 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#1,356
of 1,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,900
of 264,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#27
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,803,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,440 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.6. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.