↓ Skip to main content

Using diffusion of innovation theory to understand the factors impacting patient acceptance and use of consumer e-health innovations: a case study in a primary care clinic

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
172 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
835 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using diffusion of innovation theory to understand the factors impacting patient acceptance and use of consumer e-health innovations: a case study in a primary care clinic
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12913-015-0726-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaojun Zhang, Ping Yu, Jun Yan, Ir Ton A M Spil

Abstract

Consumer e-Health is a potential solution to the problems of accessibility, quality and costs of delivering public healthcare services to patients. Although consumer e-Health has proliferated in recent years, it remains unclear if patients are willing and able to accept and use this new and rapidly developing technology. Therefore, the aim of this research is to study the factors influencing patients' acceptance and usage of consumer e-health innovations. A simple but typical consumer e-health innovation - an e-appointment scheduling service - was developed and implemented in a primary health care clinic in a regional town in Australia. A longitudinal case study was undertaken for 29 months after system implementation. The major factors influencing patients' acceptance and use of the e-appointment service were examined through the theoretical lens of Rogers' innovation diffusion theory. Data were collected from the computer log records of 25,616 patients who visited the medical centre in the entire study period, and from in-depth interviews with 125 patients. The study results show that the overall adoption rate of the e-appointment service increased slowly from 1.5% at 3 months after implementation, to 4% at 29 months, which means only the 'innovators' had used this new service. The majority of patients did not adopt this innovation. The factors contributing to the low the adoption rate were: (1) insufficient communication about the e-appointment service to the patients, (2) lack of value of the e-appointment service for the majority of patients who could easily make phone call-based appointment, and limitation of the functionality of the e-appointment service, (3) incompatibility of the new service with the patients' preference for oral communication with receptionists, and (4) the limitation of the characteristics of the patients, including their low level of Internet literacy, lack of access to a computer or the Internet at home, and a lack of experience with online health services. All of which are closely associated with the low socio-economic status of the study population. The findings point to a need for health care providers to consider and address the identified factors before implementing more complicated consumer e-health innovations.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 835 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Nigeria 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 826 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 159 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 94 11%
Researcher 71 9%
Student > Bachelor 65 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 60 7%
Other 138 17%
Unknown 248 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 120 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 83 10%
Social Sciences 80 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 73 9%
Computer Science 68 8%
Other 140 17%
Unknown 271 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2023.
All research outputs
#8,192,479
of 24,549,201 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,069
of 8,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,677
of 259,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#40
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,549,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.