↓ Skip to main content

Babesia spp. and other pathogens in ticks recovered from domestic dogs in Denmark

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Babesia spp. and other pathogens in ticks recovered from domestic dogs in Denmark
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13071-015-0843-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christen Rune Stensvold, Dua Al Marai, Lee O’Brien Andersen, Karen Angeliki Krogfelt, Jørgen Skov Jensen, Kim Søholt Larsen, Henrik Vedel Nielsen

Abstract

Newly recognized endemic foci for human babesiosis include Europe, where Ixodes ricinus, a vector for several species of Babesia, is the most commonly identified tick. Vector-based surveillance provides an early warning system for the emergence of human babesiosis, which is likely to be under-reported at emerging sites. In the present study, we set out to screen I. ricinus collected from Danish domestic dogs for Babesia, in order to identify whether humans in Denmark are exposed to the parasite. A total of 661 ticks (Ixodes spp.) were collected from 345 Danish domestic dogs during April-September 2011 and pooled, one sample per dog. DNA was extracted from each sample and examined by PCR and sequencing for Rickettsia spp., Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, Bartonella spp., Francisella tularensis, Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis, and Babesia spp. In total, 34% of the samples were positive for tick-borne microorganisms potentially pathogenic to humans: Rickettsia spp. were detected in 16% of the pools, with 79% being R. helvetica. Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato was found in 15%, with the main species identified as Borrelia afzelii (39%). Likewise, 8% of the samples were positive for Babesia spp. (Babesia microti, 82%; Babesia venatorum ('EU1'), 18%). Lastly, 1% of the samples tested positive for Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis, and 0.6% for Bartonella spp. No ticks were found to be infected with Francisella tularensis. Our data are in support of endemic occurrence of potentially zoonotic Babesia in Denmark and confirms I. ricinus as a vector of multiple pathogens of public health concern.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Serbia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 99 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Student > Master 12 12%
Other 8 8%
Professor 5 5%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 24 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 20 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 6%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 31 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2021.
All research outputs
#4,876,197
of 24,359,979 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#1,032
of 5,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,181
of 268,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#19
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,359,979 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,738 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.