You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Perioperative cardiovascular monitoring of high-risk patients: a consensus of 12
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-015-0932-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jean-Louis Vincent, Paolo Pelosi, Rupert Pearse, Didier Payen, Azriel Perel, Andreas Hoeft, Stefano Romagnoli, V Marco Ranieri, Carole Ichai, Patrice Forget, Giorgio Della Rocca, Andrew Rhodes |
| Abstract |
A significant number of surgical patients are at risk of intra- or post-operative complications or both, which are associated with increased lengths of stay, costs, and mortality. Reducing these risks is important for the individual patient but also for health-care planners and managers. Insufficient tissue perfusion and cellular oxygenation due to hypovolemia, heart dysfunction or both is one of the leading causes of perioperative complications. Adequate perioperative management guided by effective and timely hemodynamic monitoring can help reduce the risk of complications and thus potentially improve outcomes. In this review, we describe the various available hemodynamic monitoring systems and how they can best be used to guide cardiovascular and fluid management in the perioperative period in high-risk surgical patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 17% |
| United States | 8 | 13% |
| Puerto Rico | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Italy | 2 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 19% |
| Unknown | 22 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 43 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 8% |
| Scientists | 4 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 337 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 3 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 1% |
| Unknown | 320 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 49 | 15% |
| Researcher | 47 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 41 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 38 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 87 | 26% |
| Unknown | 53 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 225 | 67% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 4% |
| Engineering | 8 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 16 | 5% |
| Unknown | 66 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2017.
All research outputs
#1,072,610
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#853
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,880
of 395,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#53
of 466 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 466 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.