↓ Skip to main content

Activation of Notch1 signalling promotes multi-lineage differentiation of c-KitPOS/NKX2.5POS bone marrow stem cells: implication in stem cell translational medicine

Overview of attention for article published in Stem Cell Research & Therapy, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Activation of Notch1 signalling promotes multi-lineage differentiation of c-KitPOS/NKX2.5POS bone marrow stem cells: implication in stem cell translational medicine
Published in
Stem Cell Research & Therapy, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13287-015-0085-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ranran Ding, Xiaofan Jiang, Yanping Ha, Zhenliang Wang, Junli Guo, Hanguo Jiang, Shaojiang Zheng, Zhihua Shen, Wei Jie

Abstract

Transplantation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) can repair injured hearts. However, whether BMSC populations contain cells with cardiac stem cell characteristics is ill-defined. We report here that Notch signalling can promote differentiation of c-Kit(POS)/NKX2.5(POS) BMSCs into cardiomyocyte-like cells. Total BMSCs were isolated from Sprague-Dawley rat femurs and c-Kit(POS) cells were purified. c-Kit(POS)/NKX2.5(POS) cells were isolated by single-cell cloning, and the presence of cardiomyocyte, smooth muscle cell (SMC), and endothelial cell differentiation markers assessed by immunofluorescence staining and semi-quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis. Levels of c-Kit and Notch1-4 in total BMSCs and c-Kit(POS)/NKX2.5(POS) BMSCs were quantitated by flow cytometry. Following infection with an adenovirus over-expressing Notch1 intracellular domain (NICD), total BMSCs and c-Kit(POS)/NKX2.5(POS) cells were assessed for differentiation to cardiomyocyte, SMC, and endothelial cell lineages by immunofluorescence staining and real-time quantitative RT-PCR. Total BMSCs and c-Kit(POS)/NKX2.5(POS) cells were treated with the Notch1 ligand Jagged1 and markers of cardiomyocyte, SMC, and endothelial cell differentiation were examined by immunofluorescence staining and real-time quantitative RT-PCR analysis. c-Kit(POS)/NKX2.5(POS) cells were present among total BMSC populations, and these cells did not express markers of adult cardiomyocyte, SMC, or endothelial cell lineages. c-Kit(POS)/NKX2.5(POS) BMSCs exhibited a multi-lineage differentiation potential similar to total BMSCs. Following sorting, the c-Kit level in c-Kit(POS)/NKX2.5(POS) BMSCs was 84.4%. Flow cytometry revealed that Notch1 was the predominant Notch receptor present in total BMSCs and c-Kit(POS)/NKX2.5(POS) BMSCs. Total BMSCs and c-Kit(POS)/NKX2.5(POS) BMSCs overexpressing NICD had active Notch1 signalling accompanied by differentiation into cardiomyocyte, SMC, and endothelial cell lineages. Treatment of total BMSCs and c-Kit(POS)/NKX2.5(POS) BMSCs with exogenous Jagged1 activated Notch1 signalling and drove multi-lineage differentiation, with a tendency towards cardiac lineage differentiation in c-Kit(POS)/NKX2.5(POS) BMSCs. c-Kit(POS)/NKX2.5(POS) cells exist in total BMSC pools. Activation of Notch1 signalling contributed to multi-lineage differentiation of c-Kit(POS)/NKX2.5(POS) BMSCs, favouring differentiation into cardiomyocytes. These findings suggest that modulation of Notch1 signalling may have potential utility in stem cell translational medicine.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 16%
Other 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Other 4 21%
Unknown 4 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 32%
Engineering 2 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 5%
Other 4 21%
Unknown 4 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2016.
All research outputs
#2,876,096
of 22,803,211 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#231
of 2,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,828
of 263,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#11
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,803,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.