↓ Skip to main content

Diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for extrapulmonary and pulmonary tuberculosis when testing non-respiratory samples: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
176 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
257 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for extrapulmonary and pulmonary tuberculosis when testing non-respiratory samples: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12879-014-0709-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Maynard-Smith, Natasha Larke, Jurgens A Peters, Stephen D Lawn

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 257 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 253 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 12%
Researcher 31 12%
Student > Postgraduate 26 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 8%
Other 64 25%
Unknown 60 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 111 43%
Immunology and Microbiology 22 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 2%
Other 17 7%
Unknown 73 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,602,574
of 24,736,359 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#793
of 8,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,883
of 362,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#18
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,736,359 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.