↓ Skip to main content

In-vitro diagnosis of single and poly microbial species targeted for diabetic foot infection using e-nose technology

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
In-vitro diagnosis of single and poly microbial species targeted for diabetic foot infection using e-nose technology
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12859-015-0601-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nurlisa Yusuf, Ammar Zakaria, Mohammad Iqbal Omar, Ali Yeon Md Shakaff, Maz Jamilah Masnan, Latifah Munirah Kamarudin, Norasmadi Abdul Rahim, Nur Zawatil Isqi Zakaria, Azian Azamimi Abdullah, Amizah Othman, Mohd Sadek Yasin

Abstract

Effective management of patients with diabetic foot infection is a crucial concern. A delay in prescribing appropriate antimicrobial agent can lead to amputation or life threatening complications. Thus, this electronic nose (e-nose) technique will provide a diagnostic tool that will allow for rapid and accurate identification of a pathogen. This study investigates the performance of e-nose technique performing direct measurement of static headspace with algorithm and data interpretations which was validated by Headspace SPME-GC-MS, to determine the causative bacteria responsible for diabetic foot infection. The study was proposed to complement the wound swabbing method for bacterial culture and to serve as a rapid screening tool for bacteria species identification. The investigation focused on both single and poly microbial subjected to different agar media cultures. A multi-class technique was applied including statistical approaches such as Support Vector Machine (SVM), K Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) as well as neural networks called Probability Neural Network (PNN). Most of classifiers successfully identified poly and single microbial species with up to 90% accuracy. The results obtained from this study showed that the e-nose was able to identify and differentiate between poly and single microbial species comparable to the conventional clinical technique. It also indicates that even though poly and single bacterial species in different agar solution emit different headspace volatiles, they can still be discriminated and identified using multivariate techniques.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Unknown 105 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 28 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 17%
Engineering 12 11%
Computer Science 10 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 33 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,036,576
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#503
of 7,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,053
of 265,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#9
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,400 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.