↓ Skip to main content

The quality of childbirth care in China: women’s voices: a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The quality of childbirth care in China: women’s voices: a qualitative study
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12884-015-0545-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joanna Raven, Nynke van den Broek, Fangbiao Tao, Huang Kun, Rachel Tolhurst

Abstract

In the context of improved utilisation of health care and outcomes, rapid socio-economic development and health system reform in China, it is timely to consider the quality of services. Data on quality of maternal health care as experienced by women is limited. This study explores women's expectations and experiences of the quality of childbirth care in rural China. Thirty five semi-structured interviews and five focus group discussions were conducted with 69 women who had delivered in the past 12 months in hospitals in a rural County in Anhui Province. Data were transcribed, translated and analysed using the framework approach. Hospital delivery was preferred because it was considered safe. Home delivery was uncommon and unsupported by the health system. Expectations such as having skilled providers and privacy during childbirth were met. However, most women reported lack of cleanliness, companionship during labour, pain relief, and opportunity to participate in decision making as poor aspects of care. Absence of pain relief is one reason why women may opt for a caesarean section. These findings illustrate that to improve quality of care it is crucial to build accountability and communication between providers, women and their families. Ensuring women's participation in decision making needs to be addressed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 149 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 15%
Researcher 22 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 30 20%
Unknown 34 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 20%
Social Sciences 22 14%
Psychology 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 39 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2017.
All research outputs
#2,093,304
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#549
of 4,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,786
of 265,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#13
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.