↓ Skip to main content

Promoting male involvement to improve PMTCT uptake and reduce antenatal HIV infection: a cluster randomized controlled trial protocol

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
308 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Promoting male involvement to improve PMTCT uptake and reduce antenatal HIV infection: a cluster randomized controlled trial protocol
Published in
BMC Public Health, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-778
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karl Peltzer, Deborah Jones, Stephen M Weiss, Elisa Shikwane

Abstract

Despite the availability of a dual therapy treatment protocol and infant feeding guidelines designed to prevent mother to child transmission (PMTCT) of HIV, of the over 1 million babies born in South Africa each year, only 70% of those born to HIV positive mothers receive dual therapy. Similar to other resource-poor nations facing the integration of PMTCT into routine pregnancy and infant care, efforts in South Africa to scale up PMTCT and reduce transmission to < 5% have fallen far short of the United Nation's goal of 50% reductions in paediatric HIV by 80% coverage of mothers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 308 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 2 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Mozambique 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Malawi 1 <1%
Botswana 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Rwanda 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 298 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 83 27%
Researcher 60 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 12%
Student > Bachelor 19 6%
Student > Postgraduate 12 4%
Other 44 14%
Unknown 54 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 103 33%
Social Sciences 49 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 43 14%
Psychology 10 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Other 38 12%
Unknown 59 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2020.
All research outputs
#808,252
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#846
of 14,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,426
of 136,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#7
of 199 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 199 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.