↓ Skip to main content

High prevalence of coexisting prehypertension and prediabetes among healthy adults in northern and northeastern China

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High prevalence of coexisting prehypertension and prediabetes among healthy adults in northern and northeastern China
Published in
BMC Public Health, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-794
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jie Wu, Wen-hua Yan, Ling Qiu, Xin-qi Chen, Xiu-zhi Guo, Wei Wu, Liang-yu Xia, Xu-zhen Qin, Yan-hong Liu, Hai-tao Ding, Shao-mei Han, Cheng-li Xu, Guang-jin Zhu

Abstract

Prehypertension and prediabetes are major risk factors of cardiovascular disease, and their combined presence may result in more serious cardiovascular outcomes than expected with either prehypertension or prediabetes alone. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prevalence of coexisting prehypertension and prediabetes, and the associated risk profiles in a Chinese population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
United States 1 2%
India 1 2%
Unknown 58 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Researcher 5 8%
Professor 3 5%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 19 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 22 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2011.
All research outputs
#7,166,280
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,520
of 14,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,391
of 135,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#102
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.