You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Does clinical examination aid in the diagnosis of urinary tract infections in women? A systematic review and meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Primary Care, October 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2296-12-111 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David Medina-Bombardó, Antoni Jover-Palmer |
Abstract |
Clinicians should be aware of the diagnostic values of various symptoms, signs and antecedents. This information is particularly important in primary care settings, where sophisticated diagnostic approaches are not always feasible. The aim of the study is to determine the probability that various symptoms, signs, antecedents and tests predict urinary tract infection (UTI) in women. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 30% |
Unknown | 7 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Hong Kong | 1 | 1% |
Nigeria | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 98 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 15 | 15% |
Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 11% |
Other | 9 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
Other | 29 | 29% |
Unknown | 21 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 56% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 6% |
Unknown | 24 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2011.
All research outputs
#4,759,600
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Primary Care
#663
of 2,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,952
of 148,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Primary Care
#6
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.