Title |
Cis-regulatory somatic mutations and gene-expression alteration in B-cell lymphomas
|
---|---|
Published in |
Genome Biology, April 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13059-015-0648-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anthony Mathelier, Calvin Lefebvre, Allen W Zhang, David J Arenillas, Jiarui Ding, Wyeth W Wasserman, Sohrab P Shah |
Abstract |
With the rapid increase of whole genome sequencing of human cancers, an important opportunity to analyze and characterize somatic mutations lying within cis-regulatory regions has emerged. A focus on protein-coding regions to identify nonsense or missense mutations disruptive to protein structure and/or function has led to important insights, however the impact on gene expression of mutations lying within cis-regulatory regions remains under-explored. We analyzed somatic mutations from 84 matched tumour-normal whole genomes from B-cell lymphomas with accompanying gene expression measurements to elucidate the extent to which these cancers are disrupted by cis-regulatory mutations. We characterize mutations overlapping a high quality set of well-annotated transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs), covering a similar portion of the genome as protein-coding exons. Our results indicate that cis-regulatory mutations overlapping predicted TFBSs are enriched in promoter regions of genes involved in apoptosis or growth/proliferation. By integrating gene expression data with mutation data, our computational approach culminates with identification of cis-regulatory mutations most likely to participate in dysregulation of the gene expression program. The impact can be measured along with protein-coding mutations to highlight key mutations disrupting gene expression and pathways in cancer. Our study yields specific genes with disrupted expression triggered by genomic mutations in either the coding or the regulatory space. It implies that mutated regulatory components of the genome contribute substantially to cancer pathways. Our analyses demonstrate that identifying genomically altered cis-regulatory elements coupled with analysis of gene expression data will augment biological interpretation of mutational landscapes of cancers. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 35% |
Canada | 3 | 15% |
Australia | 1 | 5% |
India | 1 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
Brazil | 1 | 5% |
Denmark | 1 | 5% |
Norway | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 4 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 12 | 60% |
Members of the public | 7 | 35% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Norway | 2 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
Italy | 1 | 1% |
Austria | 1 | 1% |
India | 1 | 1% |
France | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
China | 1 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Other | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 78 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 28% |
Researcher | 20 | 22% |
Student > Master | 13 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
Other | 10 | 11% |
Unknown | 7 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 33 | 37% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 36% |
Computer Science | 6 | 7% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
Other | 3 | 3% |
Unknown | 10 | 11% |