↓ Skip to main content

Systematic review of reviews of intervention components associated with increased effectiveness in dietary and physical activity interventions

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
10 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
848 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
963 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systematic review of reviews of intervention components associated with increased effectiveness in dietary and physical activity interventions
Published in
BMC Public Health, February 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-119
Pubmed ID
Authors

Colin J Greaves, Kate E Sheppard, Charles Abraham, Wendy Hardeman, Michael Roden, Philip H Evans, Peter Schwarz

Abstract

To develop more efficient programmes for promoting dietary and/or physical activity change (in order to prevent type 2 diabetes) it is critical to ensure that the intervention components and characteristics most strongly associated with effectiveness are included. The aim of this systematic review of reviews was to identify intervention components that are associated with increased change in diet and/or physical activity in individuals at risk of type 2 diabetes.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 963 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 8 <1%
United States 4 <1%
Portugal 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 936 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 183 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 160 17%
Student > Bachelor 124 13%
Researcher 123 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 48 5%
Other 192 20%
Unknown 133 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 169 18%
Psychology 165 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 104 11%
Social Sciences 92 10%
Sports and Recreations 81 8%
Other 175 18%
Unknown 177 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 100. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#354,959
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#301
of 14,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,129
of 106,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#3
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.