↓ Skip to main content

Systematic review of reviews of intervention components associated with increased effectiveness in dietary and physical activity interventions

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
10 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
732 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
842 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systematic review of reviews of intervention components associated with increased effectiveness in dietary and physical activity interventions
Published in
BMC Public Health, February 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-119
Pubmed ID
Authors

Colin J Greaves, Kate E Sheppard, Charles Abraham, Wendy Hardeman, Michael Roden, Philip H Evans, Peter Schwarz

Abstract

To develop more efficient programmes for promoting dietary and/or physical activity change (in order to prevent type 2 diabetes) it is critical to ensure that the intervention components and characteristics most strongly associated with effectiveness are included. The aim of this systematic review of reviews was to identify intervention components that are associated with increased change in diet and/or physical activity in individuals at risk of type 2 diabetes.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 842 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 9 1%
United States 4 <1%
Portugal 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 814 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 166 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 140 17%
Researcher 116 14%
Student > Bachelor 113 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 43 5%
Other 171 20%
Unknown 93 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 158 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 158 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 95 11%
Social Sciences 80 10%
Sports and Recreations 76 9%
Other 141 17%
Unknown 134 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 96. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2021.
All research outputs
#271,121
of 18,197,021 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#227
of 12,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,112
of 112,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,197,021 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them