↓ Skip to main content

Asymptomatic heterotopic pancreas in Meckel’s diverticulum: a case report and review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Case Reports, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Asymptomatic heterotopic pancreas in Meckel’s diverticulum: a case report and review of the literature
Published in
Journal of Medical Case Reports, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13256-015-0576-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alfredas Kilius, Narimantas Evaldas Samalavicius, Donatas Danys, Gytis Zaldokas, Dmitrij Seinin

Abstract

Heterotopic pancreas is defined as pancreatic tissue without a real anatomical or vascular connection to the pancreas. It can be found in the stomach, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, Meckel's diverticulum, colon gall bladder, umbilicus, fallopian tube, mediastinum, spleen and liver. Complications of heterotopic pancreas are inflammation, bleeding, obstruction, malignant transformation, carcinoid syndrome, jejunojejunal intussusception and ileus, but it is usually asymptomatic and diagnosed only during examinations for other diseases. An 81-year-old Lithuanian woman was diagnosed with caecal cancer and had undergone elective surgery. A right hemicolectomy was performed and a Meckel's diverticulum was observed and excised. Histological results showed a poorly differentiated G3 adenocarcinoma of her large intestine and heterotopic pancreas tissue in the Meckel's diverticulum and mesenteric adipose tissue. Asymptomatic heterotopic pancreas is rarely diagnosed, and usually found incidentally during surgical or diagnostic interventions. Although it has no symptoms, heterotopic pancreas found during surgical procedures should be excised.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 24%
Other 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 4 24%
Unknown 4 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 3 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2015.
All research outputs
#18,410,971
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#2,258
of 3,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,927
of 263,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#22
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,916 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.