↓ Skip to main content

Mutual exclusion of Asaia and Wolbachia in the reproductive organs of mosquito vectors

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mutual exclusion of Asaia and Wolbachia in the reproductive organs of mosquito vectors
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13071-015-0888-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paolo Rossi, Irene Ricci, Alessia Cappelli, Claudia Damiani, Ulisse Ulissi, Maria Vittoria Mancini, Matteo Valzano, Aida Capone, Sara Epis, Elena Crotti, Bessem Chouaia, Patrizia Scuppa, Deepak Joshi, Zhiyong Xi, Mauro Mandrioli, Luciano Sacchi, Scott L. O’Neill, Guido Favia

Abstract

Wolbachia is a group of intracellular maternally inherited bacteria infecting a high number of arthropod species. Their presence in different mosquito species has been largely described, but Aedes aegypti, the main vector of Dengue virus, has never been found naturally infected by Wolbachia. Similarly, malaria vectors and other anophelines are normally negative to Wolbachia, with the exception of an African population where these bacteria have recently been detected. Asaia is an acetic acid bacterium stably associated with several mosquito species, found as a dominant microorganism of the mosquito microbiota. Asaia has been described in gut, salivary glands and in reproductive organs of adult mosquitoes in Ae. aegypti and in anophelines. It has recently been shown that Asaia may impede vertical transmission of Wolbachia in Anopheles mosquitoes. Here we present an experimental study, aimed at determining whether there is a negative interference between Asaia and Wolbachia, for the gonad niche in mosquitoes. Different methods (PCR and qPCR, monoclonal antibody staining and FISH) have been used to address the question of the co-localization and the relative presence/abundance of the two symbionts. PCR and qPCR were performed to qualitatively and quantitatively verify the distribution of Asaia and Wolbachia in different mosquito species/organs. Monoclonal antibody staining and FISH were performed to localize the symbionts in different mosquito species. Here we provide evidence that, in Anopheles and in other mosquitoes, there is a reciprocal negative interference between Asaia and Wolbachia symbionts, in terms of the colonization of the gonads. In particular, we have shown that in some mosquito species the presence of one of the symbionts prevented the establishment of the second, while in other systems the symbionts were co-localized, although at reduced densities. A mutual exclusion or a competition between Asaia and Wolbachia may contribute to explain the inability of Wolbachia to colonize the female reproductive organs of anophelines, inhibiting its vertical transmission and explaining the absence of Wolbachia infection in Ae. aegypti and in the majority of natural populations of Anopheles mosquitoes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 162 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 15%
Student > Bachelor 23 14%
Student > Master 22 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 31 18%
Unknown 26 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 4%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 30 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2015.
All research outputs
#13,647,594
of 23,549,388 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#2,359
of 5,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,235
of 267,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#47
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,549,388 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,575 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.