↓ Skip to main content

The application of the palliative prognostic index, charlson comorbidity index, and Glasgow prognostic score in predicting the life expectancy of patients with hematologic malignancies under…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Palliative Care, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The application of the palliative prognostic index, charlson comorbidity index, and Glasgow prognostic score in predicting the life expectancy of patients with hematologic malignancies under palliative care
Published in
BMC Palliative Care, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12904-015-0011-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wen-Chi Chou, Chen-Yi Kao, Po-Nan Wang, Hung Chang, Hung-Ming Wang, Pei-Hung Chang, Kun-Yun Yeh, Yu-Shin Hung

Abstract

The clinical course for hematologic malignancy varies widely and no prognostic tool is available for patients with a hematologic malignancy under palliative care. To assess the application of the Palliative Prognostic Index (PPI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) as prognostic tools in patients with hematologic malignancies under palliative care. We included 217 patients with pathologically proven hematologic malignancies under palliative care consultation service (PCCS) between January 2006 and December 2012 at a single medical center in Taiwan. Patients were categorized into subgroups by PPI, CCI, and GPS for survival analysis. The median survival was 16 days (interquartile range, 4-47.5 days) for all patients and 204 patients (94%) died within 180 days after PCCS. There was a significant difference in survival among patients categorized using the PPI (median survival 49, 15, and 7 days in patients categorized into a good, intermittent, and poor prognostic group, respectively) and the GPS (median survival 66 and 13 days for GPS 0 and 1, respectively). There was no difference in survival between patients with a GPS score of 0 versus 2, or a CCI score of 0 versus ≥1. The survival time was significantly discriminated after stratifying patients with a good PPI score based on the CCI (median survival 102 and 41 days in patients with a CCI score of 0 and ≥1, respectively) from those with a poor PPI score by using the GPS (median survival 47 and 7 days in patients with GPS scores of 0 and 1-2, respectively). PPI is a useful prognosticator of life expectancy in terminally ill patients under palliative care for a hematologic malignancy. Concurrent use of the GPS and CCI improved the accuracy of prognostication using the PPI.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 76 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 18%
Other 9 11%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 25 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 32 40%