↓ Skip to main content

Central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference combined with arterial-to-venous oxygen content difference is associated with lactate evolution in the hemodynamic resuscitation process in early…

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference combined with arterial-to-venous oxygen content difference is associated with lactate evolution in the hemodynamic resuscitation process in early septic shock
Published in
Critical Care, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13054-015-0858-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jaume Mesquida, Paula Saludes, Guillem Gruartmoner, Cristina Espinal, Eva Torrents, Francisco Baigorri, Antonio Artigas

Abstract

Since normal or high central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) values cannot discriminate if tissue perfusion is adequate, integrating other markers of tissue hypoxia, such as central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference (PcvaCO2 gap) has been proposed. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the ability of the PcvaCO2 gap and the PcvaCO2/arterial-venous oxygen content difference ratio (PcvaCO2/CavO2) to predict lactate evolution in septic shock. Observational study. Septic shock patients within the first 24 hours of ICU admission. After restoration of mean arterial pressure, and central venous oxygen saturation, the PcvaCO2 gap and the PcvaCO2/CavO2 ratio were calculated. Consecutive arterial and central venous blood samples were obtained for each patient within 24 hours. Lactate improvement was defined as the decrease ≥ 10% of the previous lactate value. Thirty-five septic shock patients were studied. At inclusion, the PcvaCO2 gap was 5.6 ± 2.1 mmHg, and the PcvaCO2/CavO2 ratio was 1.6 ± 0.7 mmHg · dL/mL O2. Those patients whose lactate values did not decrease had higher PcvaCO2/CavO2 ratio values at inclusion (1.8 ± 0.8vs. 1.4 ± 0.5, p 0.02). During the follow-up, 97 paired blood samples were obtained. No-improvement in lactate values was associated to higher PcvaCO2/CavO2 ratio values in the previous control. The ROC analysis showed an AUC 0.82 (p < 0.001), and a PcvaCO2/CavO2 ratio cut-off value of 1.4 mmHg · dL/mL O2 showed sensitivity 0.80 and specificity 0.75 for lactate improvement prediction. The odds ratio of an adequate lactate clearance was 0.10 (p < 0.001) in those patients with an elevated PcvaCO2/CavO2 ratio (≥1.4). In a population of septic shock patients with normalized MAP and ScvO2, the presence of elevated PcvaCO2/CavO2 ratio significantly reduced the odds of adequate lactate clearance during the following hours.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 129 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 22 16%
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Master 15 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Other 13 10%
Other 31 23%
Unknown 23 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 87 65%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Arts and Humanities 2 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 30 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2017.
All research outputs
#8,262,445
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,317
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,884
of 395,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#375
of 466 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 466 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.