↓ Skip to main content

Face and content validity of a novel, web-based otoscopy simulator for medical education

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Face and content validity of a novel, web-based otoscopy simulator for medical education
Published in
Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40463-015-0060-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brandon Wickens, Jordan Lewis, David P Morris, Murad Husein, Hanif M Ladak, Sumit K Agrawal

Abstract

Despite the fact that otoscopy is a widely used and taught diagnostic tool during medical training, errors in diagnosis are common. Physical otoscopy simulators have high fidelity, but they can be expensive and only a limited number of students can use them at a given time. 1) To develop a purely web-based otoscopy simulator that can easily be distributed to students over the internet. 2) To assess face and content validity of the simulator by surveying experts in otoscopy. An otoscopy simulator, OtoTrain™, was developed at Western University using web-based programming and Unity 3D. Eleven experts from academic institutions in North America were recruited to test the simulator and respond to an online questionnaire. A 7-point Likert scale was used to answer questions related to face validity (realism of the simulator), content validity (expert evaluation of subject matter and test items), and applicability to medical training. The mean responses for the face validity, content validity, and applicability to medical training portions of the questionnaire were all ≤3, falling between the "Agree", "Mostly Agree", and "Strongly Agree" categories. The responses suggest good face and content validity of the simulator. Open-ended questions revealed that the primary drawbacks of the simulator were the lack of a haptic arm for force feedback, a need for increased focus on pneumatic otoscopy, and few rare disorders shown on otoscopy. OtoTrain™ is a novel, web-based otoscopy simulator that can be easily distributed and used by students on a variety of platforms. Initial face and content validity was encouraging, and a skills transference study is planned following further modifications and improvements to the simulator.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 62 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 15%
Other 7 11%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 19 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 36%
Computer Science 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 23 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2015.
All research outputs
#23,154,082
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery
#512
of 632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,681
of 270,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 632 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.