You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Open Data, Open Source and Open Standards in chemistry: The Blue Obelisk five years on
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Cheminformatics, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1758-2946-3-37 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Noel M O'Boyle, Rajarshi Guha, Egon L Willighagen, Samuel E Adams, Jonathan Alvarsson, Jean-Claude Bradley, Igor V Filippov, Robert M Hanson, Marcus D Hanwell, Geoffrey R Hutchison, Craig A James, Nina Jeliazkova, Andrew SID Lang, Karol M Langner, David C Lonie, Daniel M Lowe, Jérôme Pansanel, Dmitry Pavlov, Ola Spjuth, Christoph Steinbeck, Adam L Tenderholt, Kevin J Theisen, Peter Murray-Rust |
| Abstract |
The Blue Obelisk movement was established in 2005 as a response to the lack of Open Data, Open Standards and Open Source (ODOSOS) in chemistry. It aims to make it easier to carry out chemistry research by promoting interoperability between chemistry software, encouraging cooperation between Open Source developers, and developing community resources and Open Standards. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 14% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 4% |
| Turkey | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 16 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 71% |
| Scientists | 6 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 5% |
| Germany | 3 | 1% |
| Portugal | 3 | 1% |
| Sweden | 3 | 1% |
| Bulgaria | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 2% |
| Unknown | 170 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 27% |
| Researcher | 45 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 9% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 42 | 21% |
| Unknown | 12 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 64 | 31% |
| Computer Science | 36 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 13% |
| Engineering | 10 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 38 | 19% |
| Unknown | 20 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2023.
All research outputs
#597,622
of 24,701,594 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cheminformatics
#7
of 921 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,243
of 140,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cheminformatics
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,701,594 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 921 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.