You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
SCOWLP update: 3D classification of protein-protein, -peptide, -saccharide and -nucleic acid interactions, and structure-based binding inferences across folds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-12-398 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joan Teyra, Sergey A Samsonov, Sven Schreiber, M Teresa Pisabarro |
| Abstract |
Protein interactions are essential for coordinating cellular functions. Proteomic studies have already elucidated a huge amount of protein-protein interactions that require detailed functional analysis. Understanding the structural basis of each individual interaction through their structural determination is necessary, yet an unfeasible task. Therefore, computational tools able to predict protein binding regions and recognition modes are required to rationalize putative molecular functions for proteins. With this aim, we previously created SCOWLP, a structural classification of protein binding regions at protein family level, based on the information obtained from high-resolution 3D protein-protein and protein-peptide complexes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 190 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 21% |
| Researcher | 37 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 13% |
| Unknown | 36 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 55 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 34 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 27 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 11 | 5% |
| Engineering | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 31 | 15% |
| Unknown | 37 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2011.
All research outputs
#12,848,572
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#3,775
of 7,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,649
of 135,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#51
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.