↓ Skip to main content

Electronic medical record-based multicondition models to predict the risk of 30 day readmission or death among adult medicine patients: validation and comparison to existing models

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Electronic medical record-based multicondition models to predict the risk of 30 day readmission or death among adult medicine patients: validation and comparison to existing models
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12911-015-0162-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruben Amarasingham, Ferdinand Velasco, Bin Xie, Christopher Clark, Ying Ma, Song Zhang, Deepa Bhat, Brian Lucena, Marco Huesch, Ethan A. Halm

Abstract

There is increasing interest in using prediction models to identify patients at risk of readmission or death after hospital discharge, but existing models have significant limitations. Electronic medical record (EMR) based models that can be used to predict risk on multiple disease conditions among a wide range of patient demographics early in the hospitalization are needed. The objective of this study was to evaluate the degree to which EMR-based risk models for 30-day readmission or mortality accurately identify high risk patients and to compare these models with published claims-based models. Data were analyzed from all consecutive adult patients admitted to internal medicine services at 7 large hospitals belonging to 3 health systems in Dallas/Fort Worth between November 2009 and October 2010 and split randomly into derivation and validation cohorts. Performance of the model was evaluated against the Canadian LACE mortality or readmission model and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Hospital Wide Readmission model. Among the 39,604 adults hospitalized for a broad range of medical reasons, 2.8 % of patients died, 12.7 % were readmitted, and 14.7 % were readmitted or died within 30 days after discharge. The electronic multicondition models for the composite outcome of 30-day mortality or readmission had good discrimination using data available within 24 h of admission (C statistic 0.69; 95 % CI, 0.68-0.70), or at discharge (0.71; 95 % CI, 0.70-0.72), and were significantly better than the LACE model (0.65; 95 % CI, 0.64-0.66; P =0.02) with significant NRI (0.16) and IDI (0.039, 95 % CI, 0.035-0.044). The electronic multicondition model for 30-day readmission alone had good discrimination using data available within 24 h of admission (C statistic 0.66; 95 % CI, 0.65-0.67) or at discharge (0.68; 95 % CI, 0.67-0.69), and performed significantly better than the CMS model (0.61; 95 % CI, 0.59-0.62; P < 0.01) with significant NRI (0.20) and IDI (0.037, 95 % CI, 0.033-0.041). A new electronic multicondition model based on information derived from the EMR predicted mortality and readmission at 30 days, and was superior to previously published claims-based models.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 111 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 22%
Student > Master 17 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 9%
Other 7 6%
Other 23 20%
Unknown 23 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 12%
Computer Science 8 7%
Social Sciences 8 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 4%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 28 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,490,728
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#398
of 1,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,512
of 266,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#10
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,988 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.