You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mosaic analysis of stem cell function and wound healing in the mouse corneal epithelium
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Developmental Biology, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-213x-9-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard L Mort, Thaya Ramaesh, Dirk A Kleinjan, Steven D Morley, John D West |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 53 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 30% |
| Researcher | 11 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 8 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 18% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 10 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2018.
All research outputs
#7,459,393
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from BMC Developmental Biology
#124
of 369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,990
of 169,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Developmental Biology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 369 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them