You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Gaps in smiles and services: a cross-sectional study of dental caries in refugee-background children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Oral Health, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6831-15-10 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alicia Quach, Ingrid L Laemmle-Ruff, Tatiana Polizzi, Georgia A Paxton |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 18% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 29% |
| Unknown | 24 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Psychology | 4 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 28 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2015.
All research outputs
#4,174,441
of 22,807,037 outputs
Outputs from BMC Oral Health
#244
of 1,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,145
of 351,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Oral Health
#11
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,807,037 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,467 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.