↓ Skip to main content

The Th17 axis in psoriatic disease: pathogenetic and therapeutic implications

Overview of attention for article published in Autoimmunity Highlights, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Th17 axis in psoriatic disease: pathogenetic and therapeutic implications
Published in
Autoimmunity Highlights, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s13317-013-0057-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Beatrice Marinoni, Angela Ceribelli, Marco S. Massarotti, Carlo Selmi

Abstract

Psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis represent two paradigmatic conditions characterized by chronic inflammation and possibly autoimmunity, despite the absence of known serum autoantibodies. The two diseases, albeit strongly correlated from clinical, genetic, and epidemiogical standpoints, manifest significant differences in terms of etiology and pathogenetic mechanisms. Nonetheless, Th17 cells appear crucial to both diseases, and IL23 is the cytokine involved in determining the fate of naive CD4+ cells to differentiate into a pathogenic phenotype. This basic experimental observation led to a clear understanding of the immune dysfunction causing psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis but, more importantly, also led to new therapeutic approaches. In recent years, monoclonal antibodies directed to IL12/IL23 (ustekinumab) or IL17 (secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab) are being investigated or have proven to be beneficial for patients with psoriatic disease, thus further supporting the view that Th17 cells play a pivotal role in disease onset and perpetuation. These most recent reports indeed represent significant developments that may allow overcoming the TNFα pathway as the major therapeutic target in chronic inflammation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 122 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 16%
Researcher 20 16%
Student > Bachelor 18 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Other 27 21%
Unknown 22 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 26 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2021.
All research outputs
#7,215,323
of 22,807,037 outputs
Outputs from Autoimmunity Highlights
#24
of 85 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,927
of 305,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Autoimmunity Highlights
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,807,037 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 85 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them