↓ Skip to main content

Real-time PCR applications for diagnosis of leishmaniasis

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
112 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
393 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Real-time PCR applications for diagnosis of leishmaniasis
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, May 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13071-018-2859-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luca Galluzzi, Marcello Ceccarelli, Aurora Diotallevi, Michele Menotta, Mauro Magnani

Abstract

Leishmaniasis is a vector-borne disease caused by many Leishmania species, which can infect both humans and other mammals. Leishmaniasis is a complex disease, with heterogeneous clinical manifestations ranging from asymptomatic infections to lesions at cutaneous sites (cutaneous leishmaniasis), mucosal sites (mucocutaneous leishmaniasis) or in visceral organs (visceral leishmaniasis), depending on the species and host characteristics. Often, symptoms are inconclusive and leishmaniasis can be confused with other co-endemic diseases. Moreover, co-infections (mainly with HIV in humans) can produce atypical clinical presentations. A correct diagnosis is crucial to apply the appropriate treatment and the use of molecular techniques in diagnosis of leishmaniasis has become increasingly relevant due to their remarkable sensitivity, specificity and possible application to a variety of clinical samples. Among them, real-time PCR (qPCR)-based approaches have become increasingly popular in the last years not only for detection and quantification of Leishmania species but also for species identification. However, despite qPCR-based methods having proven to be very effective in the diagnosis of leishmaniasis, a standardized method does not exist. This review summarizes the qPCR-based methods in the diagnosis of leishmaniasis focusing on the recent developments and applications in this field.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 393 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 393 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 59 15%
Student > Master 51 13%
Researcher 38 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 6%
Other 45 11%
Unknown 154 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 65 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 26 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 24 6%
Other 33 8%
Unknown 172 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2018.
All research outputs
#15,506,823
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#3,416
of 5,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,964
of 326,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#109
of 166 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 166 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.