You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cluster randomised controlled trial of a theory-based multiple behaviour change intervention aimed at healthcare professionals to improve their management of type 2 diabetes in primary care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-018-0754-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Justin Presseau, Joan Mackintosh, Gillian Hawthorne, Jill J. Francis, Marie Johnston, Jeremy M. Grimshaw, Nick Steen, Tom Coulthard, Heather Brown, Eileen Kaner, Marko Elovainio, Falko F. Sniehotta |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 24 | 35% |
| Canada | 7 | 10% |
| United States | 6 | 9% |
| Australia | 4 | 6% |
| Ireland | 4 | 6% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Oman | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 18 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 31 | 45% |
| Members of the public | 27 | 39% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 234 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 21 | 9% |
| Researcher | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 48 | 21% |
| Unknown | 78 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 21% |
| Unspecified | 21 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 7% |
| Psychology | 10 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 38 | 16% |
| Unknown | 93 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2018.
All research outputs
#1,075,355
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#160
of 1,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,247
of 342,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#4
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.