↓ Skip to main content

Biotransformation of acetophenone and its halogen derivatives by Yarrowia lipolytica strains

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Microbiology, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biotransformation of acetophenone and its halogen derivatives by Yarrowia lipolytica strains
Published in
Annals of Microbiology, August 2014
DOI 10.1007/s13213-014-0955-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tomasz Janeczko, Wojciech Bąkowski, Ewa Walczak, Małgorzata Robak, Jadwiga Dmochowska-Gładysz, Edyta Kostrzewa-Susłow

Abstract

The ability of 16 strains of Yarrowia lipolytica to biotransform acetophenone and its derivatives has been studied. Thirteen of these strains were derived from a wild-type strain Y. lipolytica A-101; six had the invertase gene (SUC2) from Saccharomyces cerevisiae integrated into their genome, as well as the damaged or undamaged gene encoding orotidine-5'-phosphate decarboxylase (URA3), three had integrated the damaged URA3 gene into their genome and three were UV acetate-negative mutants, not able to growth on acetate as the sole carbon source. The other tested strains included two wild strains, A-101 and PMR-1, and an adenine auxotroph ATCC 32-338A. All strains were capable of reducing acetophenone to the R-alcohol in high enantiomeric excess (80-89 %). In all of the cultures tested, reversibility of the reduction was observed, which led to an increase in the enantiomeric excess. nantioselective reduction of the acetophenone halogen derivatives revealed that the nature and location of the halogen atom had a significant influence on the enantioselectivity of the reduction. In the culture of ATCC 32-338A, after a 3-day biotransformation of 2,4'-dibromoacetophenone the enantiopure R-alcohol was obtained at a rate of 100 % of substrate conversion. In conclusion, using these invertase-containing strains or uracyl auxotrophs provided no additional benefit in terms of biotransformation capacity over the parental strain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 24%
Researcher 3 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Professor 2 10%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 6 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 19%
Chemistry 2 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Unspecified 1 5%
Chemical Engineering 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 8 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2015.
All research outputs
#20,274,720
of 22,807,037 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Microbiology
#240
of 268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,686
of 235,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Microbiology
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,807,037 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.