↓ Skip to main content

Improving interMediAte Risk management. MARK study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving interMediAte Risk management. MARK study
Published in
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2261-11-61
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruth Martí, Dídac Parramon, Luís García-Ortiz, Fernando Rigo, Manuel A Gómez-Marcos, Irene Sempere, Natividad García-Regalado, Jose I Recio-Rodriguez, Cristina Agudo-Conde, Natalia Feuerbach, Maria Garcia-Gil, Anna Ponjoan, Miquel Quesada, Rafel Ramos

Abstract

Cardiovascular risk functions fail to identify more than 50% of patients who develop cardiovascular disease. This is especially evident in the intermediate-risk patients in which clinical management becomes difficult. Our purpose is to analyze if ankle-brachial index (ABI), measures of arterial stiffness, postprandial glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, self-measured blood pressure and presence of comorbidity are independently associated to incidence of vascular events and whether they can improve the predictive capacity of current risk equations in the intermediate-risk population.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 144 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 14%
Student > Bachelor 21 14%
Student > Master 16 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Other 13 9%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 34 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 12%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 40 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2011.
All research outputs
#7,409,093
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#418
of 1,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,924
of 135,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,587 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them