↓ Skip to main content

Ethnobotany of the Monpa ethnic group at Arunachal Pradesh, India

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 731)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
270 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ethnobotany of the Monpa ethnic group at Arunachal Pradesh, India
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1746-4269-7-31
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nima D Namsa, Manabendra Mandal, Sumpam Tangjang, Subhash C Mandal

Abstract

The present paper documents the uses of plants in traditional herbal medicine for human and veterinary ailments, and those used for dietary supplements, religious purpose, local beverage, and plants used to poison fish and wild animals. Traditional botanical medicine is the primary mode of healthcare for most of the rural population in Arunachal Pradesh.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 266 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 19%
Researcher 25 9%
Student > Bachelor 23 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 6%
Student > Master 16 6%
Other 56 21%
Unknown 82 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 22%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 22 8%
Environmental Science 21 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 6%
Other 40 15%
Unknown 96 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2014.
All research outputs
#2,082,571
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#49
of 731 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,903
of 136,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 731 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.