↓ Skip to main content

Q

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biology, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
citeulike
9 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Q&A: Promise and pitfalls of genome-wide association studies
Published in
BMC Biology, April 2010
DOI 10.1186/1741-7007-8-41
Authors

John FY Brookfield

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 7%
United Kingdom 5 4%
Germany 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 107 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 54 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 22%
Student > Master 11 8%
Professor 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 3 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 77 57%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 11%
Computer Science 5 4%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 5 4%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2011.
All research outputs
#15,236,094
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biology
#1,741
of 1,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,119
of 94,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biology
#29
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,973 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.